
I got an email this morning mentioning the following:
This is just a notice that your DreamHost Account #XXXXX has a balance of $71.34 (including any charges not due until 2009-01-23), with $71.34 due (since 2008-12-23).
What?!? I renewed my subscription about a year ago (if I remember correctly), and I got a 2 year renewal, meaning that I should still have about a year left. Furthermore, I completely used rewards money to pay my bill (since I had it available), so my credit card was never charged to begin with. Thankfully, the credit card they have on file for me had expired, but I’ve lost all of my referral rewards! Needless to say, I was pretty upset by this. Then I found this post over at their emergency status blog: “billing issues“. It seems like something went wrong, they know about it, and are fixing it.
I have yet to get my money back, and I have no doubt they’ll fix the problem, but it bothers me nonetheless. This problem, coupled with the DreamHost hack seen back in June, are starting to concern me. Not to mention the fact that the server this blog is hosted on has degraded in performance drastically over the past several months. It might be time for me to find another web host. I’ll be sure to keep you posted.
Update: To their credit, DreamHost has corrected the issue. They also posted about what happened.
Gizmodo has a Cliff’s notes edition of some recent statements made by FCC chairman Kevin Martin. While the article (and the statements) have to be taken with a grain of salt, if any of what he says comes to pass, it will be good times for consumers. Particularly interesting to me are the facts that he thinks cable is too expensive (it is), and that the term “broadband” should indicate something higher than 200 Kbps (I had no idea our defined value for that was so low!). We can only hope that he keeps his word on at least a few of these items.
Warner Brothers studios has officially defected to the Blu-ray format, and now Paramount seems poised to do the same. This is all but the end for the HD-DVD format, which is a real shame. Granted, there’s no real difference between the two formats (none that are apparent to the common consumer, anyway). Blu-ray discs may end up being more expensive, due to the fact that they cost a little more to manufacture. They also continue the stupid “region coding,” where certain discs will only play in the players purchased in a specific geographic location.
If for no other reason, I wanted HD-DVD to win the “format war” because Blu-ray is backed by Sony. Any day that Sony fails is a good day in my opinion, and it’s a shame that the movie studios decided to take the low-road. Time will tell how well this format takes off.
I missed one highlight from CES in yesterday’s post. Namely, the 150-inch television from Panasonic. With televisions like this on the horizon, I predict a weakening in movie theater ticket sales.
I’ve only been casually following the events at this year’s CES, but a few things I’ve seen have been pretty impressive: